- android.gs
- Compare
- Velvet vs Galaxy S10 Plus
LG Velvet vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
What Velvet does better (7) and where Galaxy S10 Plus wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display6.5
6.5Camera6.4
2.9Battery3.0
8.3Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
VelvetGalaxy S10 Plus
| Velvet | Galaxy S10 Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.1 mm | 157.6 mm | +9.5 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.1 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 175 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Velvet better than Galaxy S10 Plus?
- Main camera48 MP vs 16 MP3×
- NFCYes · Galaxy S10 Plus: No
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 4,100 mAh+5%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Galaxy S10 Plus: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 10 MP+60%
Why is Galaxy S10 Plus better than Velvet?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 1,024 GB8×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Velvet: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 522 ppi+32%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Wireless charging power9 W vs 15 W+67%
- Weight180 g vs 175 g+3%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Process10 nm vs 8 nm+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 167.1 mm | 157.6 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Black, Aurora Silver | Black, Blue, Green, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 3,040 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 522 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 787 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 87.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Samsung |
| Process | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Mali G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 782,239 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,593 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 952 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 4,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 9 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI |
