- android.gs
- Compare
- Velvet vs X50 Pro 5G
LG Velvet vs Realme X50 Pro 5G
What Velvet does better (10) and where X50 Pro 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display7.1
6.5Camera8.1
2.9Battery4.8
8.3Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
VelvetX50 Pro 5G
| Velvet | X50 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.1 mm | 159 mm | +8.1 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 205 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Velvet better than X50 Pro 5G?
- Wireless chargingYes · X50 Pro 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X50 Pro 5G: No
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+2%
- Memory card slotYes · X50 Pro 5G: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · X50 Pro 5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X50 Pro 5G: No
- Weight180 g vs 205 g+14%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.9 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.7% vs 84.9%+4%
Why is X50 Pro 5G better than Velvet?
- Wired charging15 W vs 65 W4.3×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Velvet: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Process10 nm vs 7 nm+43%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 167.1 mm | 159 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Aurora Silver | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 635 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 592,447 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,175 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 86% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 9 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
