- android.gs
- Compare
- Velvet 5G vs Moto G9 Play
LG Velvet 5G vs Motorola Moto G9 Play
What Velvet 5G does better (23) and where Moto G9 Play wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display3.1
3.3Performance2.1
6.5Camera3.9
3.8Battery5.0
8.4Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Velvet 5GMoto G9 Play
| Velvet 5G | Moto G9 Play | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 165.2 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.7 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 200 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Velvet 5G better than Moto G9 Play?
- AnTuTu score297,372 vs 170,064+75%
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- OLED panelYes · Moto G9 Play: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Moto G9 Play: No
- 5GYes · Moto G9 Play: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Moto G9 Play: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,905 vs 1,402+36%
- Wired charging25 W vs 20 W+25%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 269 ppi+47%
- Measured brightness617 nits vs 465 nits+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Why is Moto G9 Play better than Velvet 5G?
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 165.2 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Aurora White, Aurora Green, Aurora Gray, Illusion Sunset, Red, Pink | Forest Green, Sapphire Blue, Spring Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 617 nits | 465 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 82.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 11 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 297,372 | 170,064 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,905 | 1,402 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 20 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 9 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.5 LUFS | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Rear |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.23 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
