- android.gs
- Compare
- V60 ThinQ 5G UW vs nubia RedMagic 5G
LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 5G
What V60 ThinQ 5G UW does better (9) and where nubia RedMagic 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display8.9
9.0Camera7.7
7.3Battery5.1
8.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
V60 ThinQ 5G UWnubia RedMagic 5G
| V60 ThinQ 5G UW | nubia RedMagic 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.3 mm | 168.6 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 78 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 218 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V60 ThinQ 5G UW better than nubia RedMagic 5G?
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 5G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 5G: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Memory card slotYes · nubia RedMagic 5G: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 5G: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 8 MP+25%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 9.8 mm+10%
- USB version3.1 vs 3+3%
Why is nubia RedMagic 5G better than V60 ThinQ 5G UW?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · V60 ThinQ 5G UW: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.8 mm |
| Height | 169.3 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Classy Blue, Classy White | Eclipse Black, Hot Rod Red, Black, Mars Red, Cyber Neon, Transparent |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 685 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 82.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 557,056 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 13,370 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 112% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.85 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
