- android.gs
- Compare
- V50 ThinQ 5G vs Galaxy S10
LG V50 ThinQ 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S10
What V50 ThinQ 5G does better (7) and where Galaxy S10 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display6.9
5.3Camera5.0
3.1Battery2.8
8.4Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
V50 ThinQ 5GGalaxy S10
| V50 ThinQ 5G | Galaxy S10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 149.9 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 70.4 mm | +5.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 157 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V50 ThinQ 5G better than Galaxy S10?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy S10: No
- 5GYes · Galaxy S10: No
- NFCYes · Galaxy S10: No
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 3,400 mAh+18%
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.1″+5%
Why is Galaxy S10 better than V50 ThinQ 5G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Dual SIMNo · V50 ThinQ 5G: Yes
- Weight183 g vs 157 g+17%
- Pixel density537 ppi vs 550 ppi+2%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 10 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.8 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio83% vs 88%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 157 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 149.9 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 70.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Black | White, Black, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 3,040 px |
| Pixel density | 537 ppi | 550 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,215 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 817 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 88% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Samsung |
| Process | — | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 747,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,961 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 949 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 9 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, fingerprint | fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI |
