- android.gs
- Compare
- Q92 5G vs Galaxy S10 Lite
LG Q92 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
What Q92 5G does better (4) and where Galaxy S10 Lite wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display5.3
6.8Camera8.6
2.6Battery4.9
8.4Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Q92 5GGalaxy S10 Lite
| Q92 5G | Galaxy S10 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.5 mm | 162.5 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75.6 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 186 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Q92 5G better than Galaxy S10 Lite?
- 5GYes · Galaxy S10 Lite: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy S10 Lite: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy S10 Lite: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
Why is Galaxy S10 Lite better than Q92 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 45 W3×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · Q92 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Q92 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+18%
- Weight193 g vs 186 g+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.5% vs 87.8%+5%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.1 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 166.5 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Colours | White, Dark Blue, Red | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 705 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 87.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 640 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 370,751 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,151 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 876 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.49 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
