- android.gs
- Compare
- K13 Pro vs Redmi Note 10 5G
Lenovo K13 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
What K13 Pro does better (5) and where Redmi Note 10 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display4.9
6.7Camera3.9
4.0Battery4.6
4.1Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
K13 ProRedmi Note 10 5G
| K13 Pro | Redmi Note 10 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 161.8 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.3 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K13 Pro better than Redmi Note 10 5G?
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi Note 10 5G: No
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi Note 10 5G better than K13 Pro?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · K13 Pro: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 405 ppi+50%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Weight200 g vs 190 g+5%
- Process11 nm vs 7 nm+57%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.5% vs 83.7%+3%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 161.8 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray, Nighttime Blue, Aurora Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 492 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.5% | 83.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 11 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 526,407 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,736 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 33% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.54 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12 |
