- android.gs
- Compare
- Blaze X vs Galaxy A35
Lava Blaze X vs Samsung Galaxy A35
What Blaze X does better (5) and where Galaxy A35 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display7.4
7.7Camera8.0
6.0Battery4.2
5.0Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blaze XGalaxy A35
| Blaze X | Galaxy A35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 161.7 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 78 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 209 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blaze X better than Galaxy A35?
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Weight183 g vs 209 g+14%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.5% vs 84.8%+6%
Why is Galaxy A35 better than Blaze X?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Blaze X: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blaze X: Yes
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blaze X: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Blaze X: Yes
- eSIMNo · Blaze X: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 161.7 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Starlight Purple, Titanium Grey | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,024 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 84.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 522,829 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,740 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 806 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.4 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.44 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
