android.gs
Compare
Blaze Duo vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

Lava Blaze Duo vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

What Blaze Duo does better (2) and where Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Lava · 2024Blaze Duo

7.2Score

2 advantages≈ $210

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

7.1Score

11 advantages≈ $220

8.2Display8.2

6.4Camera8.5

6.0Battery5.1

4.5Features4.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blaze DuoRedmi Note 13 Pro 4G

	Blaze Duo	Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G	Difference
Height	162.4 mm	161.1 mm	+1.3 mm
Width	73.9 mm	75 mm	−1.1 mm
Thickness	8.5 mm	8 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	186 g	188 g	−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blaze Duo better than Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?

5GYes · Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: No
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%

Why is Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better than Blaze Duo?

Main camera64 MP vs 200 MP3.1×
Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Optical stabilisationNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
NFCNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
Memory card slotNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
Thickness8.5 mm vs 8 mm+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Lava Blaze Duo≈ $2107.2	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G≈ $2207.1
Design
Weight	186 g	188 g
Thickness	8.5 mm	8 mm
Height	162.4 mm	161.1 mm
Width	73.9 mm	75 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP64	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Arctic White, Celestial Blue	Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,300 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,047 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.5%	88.9%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7025	Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	382,881
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,844
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	200 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.7
Main sensor size	—	1/1.4"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	—	1080p
Selfie camera	16 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.6 h
Wired charging	33 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	—	94%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.2
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	3