- android.gs
- Compare
- Blaze Duo vs Moto G Power (2024)
Lava Blaze Duo vs Motorola Moto G Power (2024)
What Blaze Duo does better (6) and where Moto G Power (2024) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display5.9
6.4Camera8.0
6.0Battery6.3
4.5Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blaze DuoMoto G Power (2024)
| Blaze Duo | Moto G Power (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 167.2 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 186 g | 201 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blaze Duo better than Moto G Power (2024)?
- OLED panelYes · Moto G Power (2024): No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Weight186 g vs 201 g+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.5% vs 84.8%+6%
Why is Moto G Power (2024) better than Blaze Duo?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
- NFCNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
- eSIMNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Blaze Duo: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Arctic White, Celestial Blue | Midnight Blue, Pale Lilac |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 550 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 84.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 636,779 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,314 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | My UX |
