- android.gs
- Compare
- Blaze Duo 3 vs Redmi A7 Pro
Lava Blaze Duo 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro
What Blaze Duo 3 does better (12) and where Redmi A7 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display6.3
4.6Camera3.8
6.0Battery6.9
5.5Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blaze Duo 3Redmi A7 Pro
| Blaze Duo 3 | Redmi A7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.2 mm | 171.5 mm | −8.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 79.5 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 210 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blaze Duo 3 better than Redmi A7 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 15 W2.2×
- Main camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi A7 Pro: No
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 254 ppi+56%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 800 nits+25%
- Charged in 30 min43% vs 21%2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Weight181 g vs 210 g+16%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 84.3%+3%
Why is Redmi A7 Pro better than Blaze Duo 3?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,300 mAh+26%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Blaze Duo 3: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.2 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Imperial Gold, Moonlight Black | Black, Mist Blue, Sunset Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7060 | Unisoc T8300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 646,113 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,069 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | 21% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 67 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
