- android.gs
- Compare
- Blaze Duo 3 vs Moto G Power (2026)
Lava Blaze Duo 3 vs Motorola Moto G Power (2026)
What Blaze Duo 3 does better (6) and where Moto G Power (2026) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display7.1
4.6Camera8.2
6.0Battery5.9
5.5Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blaze Duo 3Moto G Power (2026)
| Blaze Duo 3 | Moto G Power (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.2 mm | 166.6 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.1 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.7 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 208 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blaze Duo 3 better than Moto G Power (2026)?
- OLED panelYes · Moto G Power (2026): No
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- Weight181 g vs 208 g+15%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+8%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 387 ppi+2%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.7 mm+14%
Why is Moto G Power (2026) better than Blaze Duo 3?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Blaze Duo 3: Yes
- NFCNo · Blaze Duo 3: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blaze Duo 3: Yes
- eSIMNo · Blaze Duo 3: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Blaze Duo 3: Yes
- Charged in 30 min43% vs 47%+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 163.2 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Imperial Gold, Moonlight Black | Pantone: Evening Blue, Pure Cashmere |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,388 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 940 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 86.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7060 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 424,581 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,114 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 382 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.88" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.3 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -19.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
