- android.gs
- Compare
- Blaze Dragon vs Poco M7 4G
Lava Blaze Dragon vs Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
What Blaze Dragon does better (6) and where Poco M7 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display7.4
4.6Camera4.6
4.6Battery8.3
4.5Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blaze DragonPoco M7 4G
| Blaze Dragon | Poco M7 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.2 mm | 171.1 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 80.5 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 224 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blaze Dragon better than Poco M7 4G?
- 5GYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Weight210 g vs 224 g+7%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio105% vs 84.9%+24%
Why is Poco M7 4G better than Blaze Dragon?
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Blaze Dragon: Yes
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 850 nits+89%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 374 ppi+44%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.9″+2%
- Resolution (width)900 px vs 1,080 px+20%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.6 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 168.2 mm | 171.1 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Golden Mist, Midnight Mist | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 900 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 105% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 482,788 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,519 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
