android.gs
Compare
Rhino 1 Pro vs Galaxy A27

LAGENIO Rhino 1 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A27

What Rhino 1 Pro does better (7) and where Galaxy A27 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

LAGENIO · 2026Rhino 1 Pro

7.7Score

7 advantages≈ $280

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A27

7.9Score

13 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

6.0Display8.2

5.4Camera8.0

8.7Battery4.3

7.6Features7.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Rhino 1 ProGalaxy A27

	Rhino 1 Pro	Galaxy A27	Difference
Height	181.7 mm	162.4 mm	+19.3 mm
Width	86.3 mm	78.2 mm	+8.1 mm
Thickness	18.5 mm	7.8 mm	+10.7 mm
Weight	440 g	200 g	+240 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Rhino 1 Pro better than Galaxy A27?

Battery capacity12,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.4×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A27: No
Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%

Why is Galaxy A27 better than Rhino 1 Pro?

Peak brightness600 nits vs 1,400 nits2.3×
Weight440 g vs 200 g2.2×
OLED panelNo · Rhino 1 Pro: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · Rhino 1 Pro: Yes
5GNo · Rhino 1 Pro: Yes
Pixel density260 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
Thickness18.5 mm vs 7.8 mm2.4×
CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Rhino 1 Pro: Yes
Max video1080p vs 4K
Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Selfie camera8 MP vs 12 MP+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	LAGENIO Rhino 1 Pro≈ $2807.7	Samsung Galaxy A27≈ $2907.9
Design
Weight	440 g	200 g
Thickness	18.5 mm	7.8 mm
Height	181.7 mm	162.4 mm
Width	86.3 mm	78.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black	Black, Blue, Light Green, Light Pink
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.7″
Panel	IPS	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,640 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	260 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	1,400 nits
Measured brightness	—	800 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	72.1%	86.8%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T7250	Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Chip maker	Unisoc	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1 @850 MHz	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	—	694,659
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,973
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	911
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	8 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	—	No
Battery
Battery capacity	12,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	33 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	45%
Wireless charging	No	No
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	—	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	—	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	—	Side
Sensors	proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.78 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	6
EU label
Energy class	A	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,200
Endurance per cycle	—	51 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	B