- android.gs
- Compare
- DuraSport UW vs Edge 40 Neo
Kyocera DuraSport UW vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo
What DuraSport UW does better (5) and where Edge 40 Neo wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display8.4
5.3Camera8.3
3.9Battery4.8
7.6Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
DuraSport UWEdge 40 Neo
| DuraSport UW | Edge 40 Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154.7 mm | 159.6 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Width | 70.7 mm | 72 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 7.9 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 170 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DuraSport UW better than Edge 40 Neo?
- Wireless chargingYes · Edge 40 Neo: No
- Memory card slotYes · Edge 40 Neo: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Edge 40 Neo: No
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 402 ppi+7%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Why is Edge 40 Neo better than DuraSport UW?
- RAM4 GB vs 12 GB3×
- Wired charging27 W vs 68 W2.5×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · DuraSport UW: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · DuraSport UW: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · DuraSport UW: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+25%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 170 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 154.7 mm | 159.6 mm |
| Width | 70.7 mm | 72 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Shatter-Resistant Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,073 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 90.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 511,077 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,563 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.5 h |
| Wired charging | 27 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 8 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 (unlocked) | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | My UX |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
