- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone vs 17T
Jolla Phone vs Xiaomi 17T
What Phone does better (1) and where 17T wins (19) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone17T
| Phone | 17T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157 mm | 157.6 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.2 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 200 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone better than 17T?
- Memory card slotYes · 17T: No
Why is 17T better than Phone?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Phone: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Phone: Yes
- Battery capacity5,450 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+19%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+42%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Phone: Yes
- eSIMNo · Phone: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 460 ppi+17%
- Weight208 g vs 200 g+4%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.6″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 157 mm | 157.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Orange, Snow White, Kaamos Black | Violet, Blue, Opal White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,268 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,260 px | 2,756 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,035 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.4% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 | Mediatek Dimensity 8500 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,640,834 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,607 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,563 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,450 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.3 h |
| Wired charging | — | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Sailfish 5.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 66 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
