- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero X vs Galaxy A72
Infinix Zero X vs Samsung Galaxy A72
What Zero X does better (7) and where Galaxy A72 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.1
9.5Camera9.2
4.9Battery5.3
2.4Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero XGalaxy A72
| Zero X | Galaxy A72 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 77.4 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 203 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero X better than Galaxy A72?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Optical zoom5× vs 3×+67%
- Weight193 g vs 203 g+5%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 54%+48%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 84.4%+2%
Why is Galaxy A72 better than Zero X?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Zero X: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Zero X: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Zero X: Yes
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 800 nits+14%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+12%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Nebula Black, Starry Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 825 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 84.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 279,342 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,483 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.23 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 7.6 | upgradable to Android 14 One UI 6.1 |
