- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero Flip vs Mix Flip
Infinix Zero Flip vs Xiaomi Mix Flip
What Zero Flip does better (4) and where Mix Flip wins (14) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero FlipMix Flip
| Zero Flip | Mix Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.4 mm | 167.5 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 74 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.6 mm | = |
| Weight | 195 g | 190 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Flip better than Mix Flip?
- Wired charging70 W vs 67 W+4%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -27.6 LUFS+-11%
Why is Mix Flip better than Zero Flip?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,000 nits2.1×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Active use (test)11 h vs 12 h+9%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+27%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 460 ppi+11%
- Weight195 g vs 190 g+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 170.4 mm | 167.5 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Black, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,314 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,609,570 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,035 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,209 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,720 mAh | 4,780 mAh |
| Active use (test) | 11 h | 12 h |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
