android.gs
Compare
Zero Flip vs Galaxy Z Flip7

Infinix Zero Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

What Zero Flip does better (5) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Infinix · 2024Zero Flip

6.1Score

5 advantages≈ $630

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7

6.9Score

15 advantages≈ $600

Higher score

4.5Display5.3

5.6Camera4.9

6.1Battery4.6

3.4Features9.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Zero FlipGalaxy Z Flip7

	Zero Flip	Galaxy Z Flip7	Difference
Height	170.4 mm	166.7 mm	+3.7 mm
Width	73.4 mm	75.2 mm	−1.8 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	6.5 mm	+1.1 mm
Weight	195 g	188 g	+7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Zero Flip better than Galaxy Z Flip7?

Wired charging70 W vs 25 W2.8×
Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+10%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
Pixel density413 ppi vs 397 ppi+4%
Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -26.1 LUFS+-6%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 better than Zero Flip?

Major OS updates promised2 vs 73.5×
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Wireless chargingNo · Zero Flip: Yes
Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 2,600 nits+86%
Active use (test)11 h vs 11.9 h+8%
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+27%
Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
eSIMNo · Zero Flip: Yes
Weight195 g vs 188 g+4%
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
Thickness7.6 mm vs 6.5 mm+17%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Infinix Zero Flip≈ $6306.1	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7≈ $6006.9
Design
Weight	195 g	188 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	6.5 mm
Height	170.4 mm	166.7 mm
Width	73.4 mm	75.2 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Rock Black, Blossom Glow	Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,520 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	397 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	2,600 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,471 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.1%	88.7%
HDR	—	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8020	Exynos 2500
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Xclipse 950
AnTuTu score	—	1,513,134
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	7,433
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,636
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,720 mAh	4,300 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11 h	11.9 h
Wired charging	70 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	—	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.6 LUFS	-26.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.69 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	XOS 14.5	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	2	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	42 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A