- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero Flip vs Find N2 Flip
Infinix Zero Flip vs OPPO Find N2 Flip
What Zero Flip does better (6) and where Find N2 Flip wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display4.2
5.6Camera3.6
6.1Battery4.1
3.4Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero FlipFind N2 Flip
| Zero Flip | Find N2 Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.4 mm | 166.2 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 75.2 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 191 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Flip better than Find N2 Flip?
- Wired charging70 W vs 44 W+59%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Find N2 Flip: No
- Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+10%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Find N2 Flip: No
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 403 ppi+2%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Why is Find N2 Flip better than Zero Flip?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Major OS updates promised2 vs 42×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+23%
- eSIMNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,600 nits+14%
- Weight195 g vs 191 g+2%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 170.4 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Astral Black, Moonlit Purple, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,039 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 86.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 773,574 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,265 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,720 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -25 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, dual proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | ColorOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 4 |
