- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero Flip vs Razr Ultra 2025
Infinix Zero Flip vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
What Zero Flip does better (3) and where Razr Ultra 2025 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display9.6
5.6Camera8.8
6.1Battery8.0
3.4Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero FlipRazr Ultra 2025
| Zero Flip | Razr Ultra 2025 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.4 mm | 171.5 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 74 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.2 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 199 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Flip better than Razr Ultra 2025?
- Wired charging70 W vs 68 W+3%
- Weight195 g vs 199 g+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.1% vs 84.1%+2%
Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Zero Flip?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 4,500 nits3.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+66%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- eSIMNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 464 ppi+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 170.4 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | — | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 464 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 830 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,720 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Active use (test) | 11 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 68 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
