- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero Flip vs Razr 50
Infinix Zero Flip vs Motorola Razr 50
What Zero Flip does better (4) and where Razr 50 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero FlipRazr 50
| Zero Flip | Razr 50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.4 mm | 171.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 74 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.3 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 188 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Flip better than Razr 50?
- Wired charging70 W vs 30 W2.3×
- Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+12%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Why is Razr 50 better than Zero Flip?
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,000 nits2.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wireless chargingNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Active use (test)11 h vs 11.8 h+7%
- eSIMNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Weight195 g vs 188 g+4%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -23.5 LUFS+-4%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 7.3 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 170.4 mm | 171.3 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | — | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Koala Grey (Steel Wool), Beach Sand (Pumice Stone), Spritz Orange (Arabesque) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,289 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 657,381 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,016 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 856 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,720 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Active use (test) | 11 h | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -23.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
