- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero 40 4G vs F25 Pro
Infinix Zero 40 4G vs OPPO F25 Pro
What Zero 40 4G does better (7) and where F25 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display7.7
8.8Camera7.5
6.8Battery7.2
4.1Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero 40 4GF25 Pro
| Zero 40 4G | F25 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 161.1 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 177 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero 40 4G better than F25 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · F25 Pro: No
- NFCYes · F25 Pro: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,100 nits+18%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Why is F25 Pro better than Zero 40 4G?
- Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
- 5GNo · Zero 40 4G: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Memory card slotNo · Zero 40 4G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Zero 40 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Charged in 30 min60% vs 62%+3%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.5 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda glass |
| Colours | Misty Aqua, Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Ocean Blue, Lava Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,555 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,951 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 60% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.98 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | ColorOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
