- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero 30 4G vs Galaxy A15 5G
Infinix Zero 30 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
What Zero 30 4G does better (15) and where Galaxy A15 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display6.7
4.4Performance3.2
6.7Camera6.2
6.8Battery5.8
4.5Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero 30 4GGalaxy A15 5G
| Zero 30 4G | Galaxy A15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.5 mm | 160.1 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 200 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero 30 4G better than Galaxy A15 5G?
- AnTuTu score557,120 vs 306,274+82%
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,988 vs 1,747+14%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 800 nits+19%
- Weight182 g vs 200 g+10%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 51%+47%
Why is Galaxy A15 5G better than Zero 30 4G?
- 5GNo · Zero 30 4G: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Zero 30 4G: Yes
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Zero 30 4G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Zero 30 4G: Yes
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164.5 mm | 160.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Sunset Gold, Misty Green, Pearly White | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Magical Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 786 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 557,120 | 306,274 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,988 | 1,747 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 335 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
