- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 60 vs Camon 50 4G
Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 4G
What Note 60 does better (12) and where Camon 50 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.7
6.6Performance5.1
8.0Camera8.2
8.9Battery8.5
7.3Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 60Camon 50 4G
| Note 60 | Camon 50 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.4 mm | = |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 77.2 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 199 g | 172 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 60 better than Camon 50 4G?
- AnTuTu score977,113 vs 595,376+64%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,181 vs 2,020+57%
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 50 4G: No
- 5GYes · Camon 50 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 50 4G: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min58% vs 44%+32%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
Why is Camon 50 4G better than Note 60?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Memory card slotNo · Note 60: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 172 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Unspecified |
| Colours | Mist Titanium, Midnight Black, Fizz Blue, Rose Gold, Mocha Brown | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 89.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 977,113 | 595,376 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,181 | 2,020 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 3 |
