- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 60 vs A6t Pro 4G
Infinix Note 60 vs OPPO A6t Pro 4G
What Note 60 does better (21) and where A6t Pro 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
9.6Display6.4
8.0Camera4.6
8.9Battery8.8
7.3Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 60A6t Pro 4G
| Note 60 | A6t Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 166.6 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.5 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 60 better than A6t Pro 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,125 nits4×
- OLED panelYes · A6t Pro 4G: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · A6t Pro 4G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · A6t Pro 4G: No
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 256 ppi+68%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · A6t Pro 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · A6t Pro 4G: No
- eSIMYes · A6t Pro 4G: No
Why is A6t Pro 4G better than Note 60?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+14%
- Memory card slotNo · Note 60: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Mist Titanium, Midnight Black, Fizz Blue, Rose Gold, Mocha Brown | Crystal Violet, Crystal White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 1,570 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 256 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,125 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 85.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 977,113 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,181 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | 36% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 16 | ColorOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
