How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Note 60 Pro vs Y400

Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Vivo Y400

What Note 60 Pro does better (19) and where Y400 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Infinix Note 60 Pro
Infinix · 2026Note 60 Pro
9.1Score
19 advantages≈ $380
Higher score
vs
Vivo Y400
Vivo · 2025Y400
8.4Score
4 advantages≈ $380
9.8Display8.4
8.0Camera5.9
9.1Battery9.0
7.5Features6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Note 60 ProY400
77.2 × 162.47.475.3 × 162.37.9
Note 60 ProY400Difference
Height162.4 mm162.3 mm+0.1 mm
Width77.2 mm75.3 mm+1.9 mm
Thickness7.4 mm7.9 mm−0.5 mm
Weight202 g197 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Note 60 Pro better than Y400?

  1. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
  2. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Optical stabilisationYes · Y400: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Y400: No
  5. NFCYes · Y400: No
  6. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  7. CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+23%
  8. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  9. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400: No
  10. Max video4K vs 1080p
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · Y400: No
  12. eSIMYes · Y400: No

Why is Y400 better than Note 60 Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  2. Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
  3. Memory card slotNo · Note 60 Pro: Yes
  4. Weight202 g vs 197 g+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo Y400Vivo Y400≈ $3808.4
Design
Weight202 g197 g
Thickness7.4 mm7.9 mm
Height162.4 mm162.3 mm
Width77.2 mm75.3 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP64IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i—
ColoursMist Titanium, Deep Ocean Blue, Solar Orange, Mocha Brown, Torino Black, Frost Silver, Pininfarina BlackGlam White, Olive Green
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,208 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,644 px2,400 px
Pixel density429 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,800 nits
Measured brightness1,694 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.4%87.9%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 810Adreno 613
AnTuTu score868,860—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,412—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,219—
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/2.96"
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Active use (test)16.1 h—
Wired charging90 W90 W
Charged in 30 min94%75%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45
NFCYesNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.6 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceXOS 16Funtouch 15
Major OS updates promised3—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare