How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Note 60 Pro vs Aquos R11

Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R11

What Note 60 Pro does better (10) and where Aquos R11 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Infinix Note 60 Pro
Infinix · 2026Note 60 Pro
9.1Score
10 advantages≈ $380
Higher score
vs
Sharp Aquos R11
Sharp · 2026Aquos R11
9.0Score
12 advantages
9.8Display8.6
8.0Camera9.2
9.1Battery7.4
7.5Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Note 60 ProAquos R11
77.2 × 162.47.474 × 1568.9
Note 60 ProAquos R11Difference
Height162.4 mm156 mm+6.4 mm
Width77.2 mm74 mm+3.2 mm
Thickness7.4 mm8.9 mm−1.5 mm
Weight202 g195 g+7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Note 60 Pro better than Aquos R11?

  1. Wired charging90 W vs 36 W2.5×
  2. Wireless chargingYes · Aquos R11: No
  3. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+18%
  4. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,600 nits+25%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R11: No
  6. Pixel density429 ppi vs 396 ppi+8%
  7. Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
  8. Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+20%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
  10. Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,080 px+12%

Why is Aquos R11 better than Note 60 Pro?

  1. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  3. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Telephoto cameraNo · Note 60 Pro: Yes
  5. Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.9×
  6. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  7. CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+19%
  8. Weight202 g vs 195 g+3%
  9. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  10. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  12. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight202 g195 g
Thickness7.4 mm8.9 mm
Height162.4 mm156 mm
Width77.2 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP64IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursMist Titanium, Deep Ocean Blue, Solar Orange, Mocha Brown, Torino Black, Frost Silver, Pininfarina BlackNavy, Ivory, Terracotta
Display
Screen size6.8″6.5″
PanelAMOLEDPRO IGZO LTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,208 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,644 px2,340 px
Pixel density429 ppi396 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz240 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits3,600 nits
Measured brightness1,694 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.4%89.8%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.7 GHz3.21 GHz
GPUAdreno 810Adreno 825
AnTuTu score868,860—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,412—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,219—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.55"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera13 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh5,100 mAh
Active use (test)16.1 h—
Wired charging90 W36 W
Charged in 30 min94%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.6 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceXOS 16—
Major OS updates promised33
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare