- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 50s vs Reno11 F
Infinix Note 50s vs OPPO Reno11 F
What Note 50s does better (8) and where Reno11 F wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 50sReno11 F
| Note 50s | Reno11 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 161.1 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 177 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 50s better than Reno11 F?
- Stereo speakersYes · Reno11 F: No
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
- AnTuTu score891,192 vs 841,497+6%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,949 vs 2,398+23%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,100 nits+18%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Reno11 F better than Note 50s?
- Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
- NFCNo · Note 50s: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Note 50s: Yes
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note 50s: Yes
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 62%+24%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda glass |
| Colours | Marine Blue, Titanium Grey, Ruby Red | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 891,192 | 841,497 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,949 | 2,398 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
