- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 50 4G vs Blade V70 Max
Infinix Note 50 4G vs ZTE Blade V70 Max
What Note 50 4G does better (15) and where Blade V70 Max wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display6.6
7.1Camera4.6
8.4Battery7.4
4.4Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 50 4GBlade V70 Max
| Note 50 4G | Blade V70 Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 171.8 mm | −8.5 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 78.4 mm | −4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 50 4G better than Blade V70 Max?
- Wired charging45 W vs 22 W2×
- OLED panelYes · Blade V70 Max: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V70 Max: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Blade V70 Max: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade V70 Max: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 260 ppi+51%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+38%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Blade V70 Max better than Note 50 4G?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+15%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Note 50 4G: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 171.8 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Titanium Grey, Ruby Red, Mountain Shade, Shadow Black | Purple, Green, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 83.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Unisoc T7200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,515 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,946 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 52 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
