- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 50 4G vs RugKing 4 Pro
Infinix Note 50 4G vs UleFone RugKing 4 Pro
What Note 50 4G does better (18) and where RugKing 4 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display5.2
7.1Camera3.9
8.4Battery7.9
4.4Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 50 4GRugKing 4 Pro
| Note 50 4G | RugKing 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 178.6 mm | −15.3 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 84 mm | −9.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 19.2 mm | −11.6 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 405 g | −206 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 50 4G better than RugKing 4 Pro?
- Wired charging45 W vs 18 W2.5×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 500 nits2.6×
- Weight199 g vs 405 g2×
- OLED panelYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 269 ppi+46%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 19.2 mm2.5×
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+22%
Why is RugKing 4 Pro better than Note 50 4G?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 10,200 mAh+96%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 405 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 19.2 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 178.6 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Titanium Grey, Ruby Red, Mountain Shade, Shadow Black | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 68.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,515 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,946 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
