- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 50 4G vs Spark Slim
Infinix Note 50 4G vs Tecno Spark Slim
What Note 50 4G does better (6) and where Spark Slim wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.8
4.4Performance4.6
7.1Camera5.2
8.4Battery7.8
4.4Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 50 4GSpark Slim
| Note 50 4G | Spark Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.9 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 5.9 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 156 g | +43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 50 4G better than Spark Slim?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Spark Slim: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Spark Slim: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Spark Slim: No
- Memory card slotYes · Spark Slim: No
- Dual SIMYes · Spark Slim: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Spark Slim better than Note 50 4G?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
- AnTuTu score579,515 vs 591,552+2%
- Weight199 g vs 156 g+28%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 440 ppi+12%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 5.9 mm+29%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 53%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 5.9 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Titanium Grey, Ruby Red, Mountain Shade, Shadow Black | Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 89.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,515 | 591,552 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,946 | 1,985 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
