- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 50 4G vs Pova 7
Infinix Note 50 4G vs Tecno Pova 7
What Note 50 4G does better (7) and where Pova 7 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display7.4
4.4Performance6.1
7.1Camera5.8
8.4Battery8.7
4.4Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 50 4GPova 7
| Note 50 4G | Pova 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 167.3 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 207 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 50 4G better than Pova 7?
- OLED panelYes · Pova 7: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 7: No
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 900 nits+44%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight199 g vs 207 g+4%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.9 mm+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.4% vs 86.3%+5%
Why is Pova 7 better than Note 50 4G?
- AnTuTu score579,515 vs 864,548+49%
- 5GNo · Note 50 4G: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,946 vs 2,813+45%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+15%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 52%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 207 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 167.3 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Titanium Grey, Ruby Red, Mountain Shade, Shadow Black | Geek Black, Magic Silver, Oasis Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 900 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 86.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,515 | 864,548 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,946 | 2,813 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 52% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
