- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 50 4G vs Galaxy M17
Infinix Note 50 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M17
What Note 50 4G does better (10) and where Galaxy M17 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display7.3
7.1Camera7.8
8.4Battery5.3
4.4Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 50 4GGalaxy M17
| Note 50 4G | Galaxy M17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 164.4 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.9 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 50 4G better than Galaxy M17?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy M17: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M17: No
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,100 nits+18%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 385 ppi+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.4% vs 86%+5%
Why is Galaxy M17 better than Note 50 4G?
- Major OS updates promised2 vs 63×
- 5GNo · Note 50 4G: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note 50 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Weight199 g vs 192 g+4%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Titanium Grey, Ruby Red, Mountain Shade, Shadow Black | Moonlight Silver, Sapphire Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,515 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,946 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.64 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 6 |
