- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 50 4G vs Pilot 1
Infinix Note 50 4G vs OSCAL Pilot 1
What Note 50 4G does better (13) and where Pilot 1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display5.4
7.1Camera5.9
8.4Battery8.7
4.4Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 50 4GPilot 1
| Note 50 4G | Pilot 1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 185.5 mm | −22.2 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 85 mm | −10.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 22 mm | −14.4 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 540 g | −341 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 50 4G better than Pilot 1?
- Weight199 g vs 540 g2.7×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- OLED panelYes · Pilot 1: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pilot 1: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Pilot 1: No
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 700 nits+86%
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 22 mm2.9×
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 22%2.3×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
Why is Pilot 1 better than Note 50 4G?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 15,000 mAh2.9×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 540 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 185.5 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Grey, Ruby Red, Mountain Shade, Shadow Black | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 700 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 68.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G81 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,515 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,946 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 15,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 22% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | DokeOS 4.0 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 167 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
