- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 40 vs Moto G Power (2024)
Infinix Note 40 vs Motorola Moto G Power (2024)
What Note 40 does better (11) and where Moto G Power (2024) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display5.9
4.6Performance5.1
6.6Camera8.0
7.4Battery6.3
5.5Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 40Moto G Power (2024)
| Note 40 | Moto G Power (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 167.2 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 201 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 40 better than Moto G Power (2024)?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 550 nits2.4×
- Wired charging45 W vs 30 W+50%
- OLED panelYes · Moto G Power (2024): No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight190 g vs 201 g+6%
- Wireless charging power20 W vs 15 W+33%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.9% vs 84.8%+6%
Why is Moto G Power (2024) better than Note 40?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 40: Yes
- 5GNo · Note 40: Yes
- AnTuTu score581,489 vs 636,779+10%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,024 vs 2,314+14%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note 40: Yes
- eSIMNo · Note 40: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Note 40: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Titan Gold, Obsidian Black, Racing Edition | Midnight Blue, Pale Lilac |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 550 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 84.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 581,489 | 636,779 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,024 | 2,314 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14 | My UX |
