- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 30 vs Camon 20 Pro 5G
Infinix Note 30 vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
What Note 30 does better (2) and where Camon 20 Pro 5G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display7.5
3.5Performance6.4
6.1Camera8.1
6.8Battery6.0
4.6Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 30Camon 20 Pro 5G
| Note 30 | Camon 20 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 162.7 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 75.9 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 219 g | 193 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 30 better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Charged in 30 min64% vs 38%+68%
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than Note 30?
- AnTuTu score374,263 vs 1,031,8812.8×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme348 vs 1,3003.7×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,792 vs 2,905+62%
- OLED panelNo · Note 30: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 30: Yes
- 5GNo · Note 30: Yes
- Peak brightness580 nits vs 900 nits+55%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Weight219 g vs 193 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 219 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 162.7 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Colours | Obsidian Black, Interstellar Blue, Sunset Gold | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 580 nits | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | 604 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 87% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 374,263 | 1,031,881 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,792 | 2,905 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 348 | 1,300 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14 | HIOS 14 |
