- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 10 Pro vs Galaxy A52
Infinix Note 10 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52
What Note 10 Pro does better (6) and where Galaxy A52 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display6.9
7.2Camera8.7
6.0Battery3.2
3.5Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 10 ProGalaxy A52
| Note 10 Pro | Galaxy A52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.8 mm | 159.9 mm | +12.9 mm |
| Width | 78.3 mm | 75.1 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 189 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 10 Pro better than Galaxy A52?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Screen size7″ vs 6.5″+7%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.3 LUFS vs -27 LUFS+-6%
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Note 10 Pro?
- OLED panelNo · Note 10 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 10 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Note 10 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Note 10 Pro: Yes
- Measured brightness447 nits vs 794 nits+78%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Note 10 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+12%
- Weight209 g vs 189 g+11%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 407 ppi+5%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 172.8 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 78.3 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 447 nits | 794 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 261,282 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,865 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.3 LUFS | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.61 W/kg | 0.35 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 7.6 | One UI 6.1 |
