- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 70 Pro vs Poco M8 Power
Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Power
What Hot 70 Pro does better (11) and where Poco M8 Power wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.5
5.6Performance5.2
4.6Camera4.6
8.2Battery9.0
7.8Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 70 ProPoco M8 Power
| Hot 70 Pro | Poco M8 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 169.7 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 79.5 mm | 79.1 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 225 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 70 Pro better than Poco M8 Power?
- AnTuTu score782,313 vs 611,651+28%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,882 vs 2,328+24%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco M8 Power: No
- Pixel density441 ppi vs 375 ppi+18%
- Weight204 g vs 225 g+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+4%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.5 mm+8%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Poco M8 Power better than Hot 70 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+33%
- OLED panelNo · Hot 70 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,800 nits+89%
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.2% vs 88.4%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 79.5 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Thermo Orange, Mirage Green, Silk Glow Purple, Depth Ring White, Night Pulse, Dive Blue | Black, Green, Blaze Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,344 px | 2,396 px |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 88.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 782,313 | 611,651 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,882 | 2,328 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 60% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 4 |
