- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 70 Pro vs WP66
Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs Oukitel WP66
What Hot 70 Pro does better (12) and where WP66 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display5.5
4.6Camera6.6
8.2Battery8.7
7.8Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 70 ProWP66
| Hot 70 Pro | WP66 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 172.2 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Width | 79.5 mm | 81 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 15.8 mm | −7.9 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 359 g | −155 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 70 Pro better than WP66?
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 450 nits2.1×
- Stereo speakersYes · WP66: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Weight204 g vs 359 g+76%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 15.8 mm2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · WP66: No
- Pixel density441 ppi vs 400 ppi+10%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.2% vs 75.2%+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is WP66 better than Hot 70 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 11,000 mAh+83%
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 359 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 15.8 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 172.2 mm |
| Width | 79.5 mm | 81 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Thermo Orange, Mirage Green, Silk Glow Purple, Depth Ring White, Night Pulse, Dive Blue | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,344 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 75.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 782,313 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,882 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 60% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 16 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 107 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
