- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 60 vs Blade A75 4G
Infinix Hot 60 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
What Hot 60 does better (8) and where Blade A75 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display4.8
4.6Camera4.6
6.5Battery5.1
4.6Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 60Blade A75 4G
| Hot 60 | Blade A75 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166 mm | 164.1 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.8 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 189 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 60 better than Blade A75 4G?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+38%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.6 mm+10%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Blade A75 4G better than Hot 60?
- NFCNo · Hot 60: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 22 W+25%
- Weight193 g vs 189 g+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 166 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Tundra Green, Shadow Blue, Caramel Glow | Basalt Black, Aqua Green, Marble White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 267 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 608,399 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,259 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 33% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15.1 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
