android.gs
Compare
Hot 60 Pro+ vs Y200 4G

Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ vs Vivo Y200 4G

What Hot 60 Pro+ does better (12) and where Y200 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Infinix · 2025Hot 60 Pro+

7.2Score

12 advantages

Higher score

Vivo · 2025Y200 4G

6.9Score

5 advantages≈ $230

9.8Display8.4

3.9Performance3.9

5.2Camera5.9

5.5Battery7.4

5.7Features4.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Hot 60 Pro+Y200 4G

	Hot 60 Pro+	Y200 4G	Difference
Height	164 mm	163.2 mm	+0.8 mm
Width	75.8 mm	75.9 mm	−0.1 mm
Thickness	6 mm	7.8 mm	−1.8 mm
Weight	155 g	188 g	−33 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than Y200 4G?

Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
NFCYes · Y200 4G: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,945 vs 1,524+28%
Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Weight155 g vs 188 g+21%
Pixel density440 ppi vs 395 ppi+11%
Thickness6 mm vs 7.8 mm+30%
Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 86.7%+3%

Why is Y200 4G better than Hot 60 Pro+?

Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
Memory card slotNo · Hot 60 Pro+: Yes
Charged in 30 min68% vs 80%+18%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Infinix Hot 60 Pro+7.2	Vivo Y200 4G≈ $2306.9
Design
Weight	155 g	188 g
Thickness	6 mm	7.8 mm
Height	164 mm	163.2 mm
Width	75.8 mm	75.9 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP65	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	—
Colours	Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green	Titanium Silver, Emerald Green
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,720 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	440 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	1,650 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.3%	86.7%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G200	Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Adreno 610
AnTuTu score	446,336	448,509
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	1,945	1,524
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	380	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	—
Rear cameras	1	1
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	13 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,160 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	11.2 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	68%	80%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.4	5
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	XOS 15.1	Funtouch 14
Major OS updates promised	3	—