- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 60 Pro+ vs Spark Slim
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ vs Tecno Spark Slim
What Hot 60 Pro+ does better (5) and where Spark Slim wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.8
3.9Performance4.6
5.2Camera5.2
5.5Battery7.8
5.7Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 60 Pro+Spark Slim
| Hot 60 Pro+ | Spark Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 5.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 156 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than Spark Slim?
- Stereo speakersYes · Spark Slim: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Dual SIMYes · Spark Slim: No
- Charged in 30 min68% vs 53%+28%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Spark Slim better than Hot 60 Pro+?
- AnTuTu score446,336 vs 591,552+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,945 vs 1,985+2%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 155 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 5.9 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green | Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,650 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 89.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 446,336 | 591,552 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,945 | 1,985 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 380 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15.1 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
