- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 60 Pro+ vs 60 NxtPaper 4G
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ vs TCL 60 NxtPaper 4G
What Hot 60 Pro+ does better (13) and where 60 NxtPaper 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display5.6
5.2Camera6.6
5.5Battery7.5
5.7Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 60 Pro+60 NxtPaper 4G
| Hot 60 Pro+ | 60 NxtPaper 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 167.6 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 7.9 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 190 g | −35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than 60 NxtPaper 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 550 nits8.2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- OLED panelYes · 60 NxtPaper 4G: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Weight155 g vs 190 g+23%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 395 ppi+11%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Thickness6 mm vs 7.9 mm+32%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is 60 NxtPaper 4G better than Hot 60 Pro+?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Hot 60 Pro+: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Hot 60 Pro+: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 155 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 167.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green | Dark Black, Alps White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,650 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 86.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Mediatek Helio G92 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 446,336 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,945 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 380 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 11.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15.1 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
