- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50i vs Galaxy XCover7
Infinix Hot 50i vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7
What Hot 50i does better (11) and where Galaxy XCover7 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Display4.5
2.9Performance3.7
3.9Camera4.1
4.6Battery2.7
4.0Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50iGalaxy XCover7
| Hot 50i | Galaxy XCover7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 169 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 80.1 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 10.2 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 240 g | −56 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50i better than Galaxy XCover7?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh+23%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy XCover7: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Weight184 g vs 240 g+30%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 10.2 mm+26%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.8% vs 77.5%+9%
Why is Galaxy XCover7 better than Hot 50i?
- AnTuTu score340,407 vs 518,777+52%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- 5GNo · Hot 50i: Yes
- NFCNo · Hot 50i: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,416 vs 1,900+34%
- Pixel density262 ppi vs 400 ppi+53%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- eSIMNo · Hot 50i: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 240 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 10.2 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 169 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | 60-120 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Sage Green, Titanium Grey | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 555 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 77.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 340,407 | 518,777 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,416 | 1,900 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Yes |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.08 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | One UI 8.5 |
