- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 40 vs Redmi Note 12 4G
Infinix Hot 40 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
What Hot 40 does better (6) and where Redmi Note 12 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display8.0
3.0Performance3.6
5.9Camera6.2
6.0Battery6.0
6.2Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 40Redmi Note 12 4G
| Hot 40 | Redmi Note 12 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 165.7 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 184 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 40 better than Redmi Note 12 4G?
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 12 4G: No
- AnTuTu score378,680 vs 319,219+19%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Redmi Note 12 4G better than Hot 40?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,200 nits2.4×
- OLED panelNo · Hot 40: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,342 vs 1,797+34%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+40%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hot 40: Yes
- Weight196 g vs 184 g+7%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Palm Blue, Horizon Gold, Starlit Black, Starfall Green | Onyx Gray, Mint Green, Ice Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 744 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 378,680 | 319,219 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,342 | 1,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.9 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13.5 | HyperOS |
