- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 40 vs Moto G Power 5G
Infinix Hot 40 vs Motorola Moto G Power 5G
What Hot 40 does better (9) and where Moto G Power 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display5.6
3.0Performance4.4
5.9Camera5.5
6.0Battery4.0
6.2Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 40Moto G Power 5G
| Hot 40 | Moto G Power 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 163.1 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.8 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 185 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 40 better than Moto G Power 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 15 W2.2×
- NFCYes · Moto G Power 5G: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Charged in 30 min64% vs 25%2.6×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Dual SIMYes · Moto G Power 5G: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.5 mm+2%
Why is Moto G Power 5G better than Hot 40?
- AnTuTu score378,680 vs 587,946+55%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,342 vs 2,231+66%
- 5GNo · Hot 40: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Weight196 g vs 185 g+6%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 405 ppi+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Palm Blue, Horizon Gold, Starlit Black, Starfall Green | Dark Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 | Mediatek Dimensity 930 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 378,680 | 587,946 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,342 | 2,231 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13.5 | My UX |
