- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 30 Play NFC vs Camon 20
Infinix Hot 30 Play NFC vs Tecno Camon 20
What Hot 30 Play NFC does better (6) and where Camon 20 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display5.6
2.5Performance2.8
3.7Camera6.4
7.0Battery6.0
5.0Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 30 Play NFCCamon 20
| Hot 30 Play NFC | Camon 20 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.6 mm | 163.4 mm | +7.2 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 190 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 30 Play NFC better than Camon 20?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- NFCYes · Camon 20: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz+15%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 20 better than Hot 30 Play NFC?
- Main camera16 MP vs 64 MP4×
- AnTuTu score179,682 vs 346,842+93%
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)881 vs 1,360+54%
- OLED panelNo · Hot 30 Play NFC: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Hot 30 Play NFC: Yes
- Pixel density263 ppi vs 395 ppi+50%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight205 g vs 190 g+8%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 170.6 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Mirage Black, Blade White, Bora Purple | Predawn Black, Glacier Glow, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 179,682 | 346,842 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 881 | 1,360 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 12.6 | HIOS 14 |
