- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 50 Pro vs iQOO Z11x
Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
What GT 50 Pro does better (16) and where iQOO Z11x wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 50 ProiQOO Z11x
| GT 50 Pro | iQOO Z11x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 166.6 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.4 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 219 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 50 Pro better than iQOO Z11x?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits3.8×
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z11x: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z11x: No
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Z11x: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z11x: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 382 ppi+15%
Why is iQOO Z11x better than GT 50 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+17%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Black Abyss, Red Blaze, Silver Glacier | Prismatic Green, Titan Black, Star Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,344 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,694 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 85.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,755,589 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,806 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,132 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/2.93" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 7,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 15.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 35% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
