- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 50 Pro vs RugOne Xever 8
Infinix GT 50 Pro vs UleFone RugOne Xever 8
What GT 50 Pro does better (16) and where RugOne Xever 8 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display4.2
8.6Camera6.8
8.6Battery3.3
6.9Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 50 ProRugOne Xever 8
| GT 50 Pro | RugOne Xever 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 168 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 80 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 14 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 320 g | −122 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 50 Pro better than RugOne Xever 8?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 680 nits6.6×
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+31%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Wireless chargingYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- 5GYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Weight198 g vs 320 g+62%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 395 ppi+11%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 14 mm+71%
Why is RugOne Xever 8 better than GT 50 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black Abyss, Red Blaze, Silver Glacier | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 680 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,694 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 1,755,589 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,806 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,132 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 15.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 16 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
